Trustworthy historical writing depends on evidence, context, intellectual honesty, and a willingness to correct the record.
Evidence and sourcing
We prioritize primary records, established archives, scholarly research, reputable institutions, and well-supported reporting. Major factual claims should be traceable to credible evidence. Anonymous or weakly sourced claims require additional scrutiny.
Fact, interpretation, and uncertainty
We separate documented fact from analysis and identify meaningful uncertainty or disagreement. Historical analogy can clarify patterns, but it is not proof that current events will follow the same course.
Sensitive history
Coverage of genocide, persecution, war crimes, and mass violence should be accurate, contextual, and respectful of victims. Graphic or dehumanizing material is included only when it has clear explanatory value.
Independence and advertising
Editorial choices are independent of advertisers and commercial partners. Advertising does not confer approval, influence conclusions, or purchase favorable coverage.
Corrections
Substantive factual errors are corrected promptly once verified. Significant changes should be noted clearly. Minor spelling, grammar, or formatting improvements may be made without a correction note. Readers can submit evidence through our Contact page.
Use of automated tools
Automated tools may assist research organization or production, but they do not replace editorial responsibility. Material must be reviewed for factual accuracy, originality, clarity, and appropriate sourcing before publication.